Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Article Critique Response Letter

Article Critique Response Letter

Q Does the writer make a focused analysis of the key moves made in the pop-source? Does he or she go sufficiently in-depth (focusing on 1-3 techniques), providing textual evidence for his or her evaluation at every step? While exploring these rhetorical moves in the pop-source, does the writer go beyond merely identifying the moves to explain how they function within the article? Does the writer sufficiently explore the pop-source’s relationship with the original study, without writing an overly simplistic compare-and-contrast paper?

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

The writer has made the focused analysis of the pop-source but when it comes to write an effective thesis statement the writer has fallen flat on the same. The thesis is not properly written in the last line of the introductory paragraph. The writer has written an in-depth analysis with the proper textual evidence. The analysis part is enough strong in the paper. The writer has narrated a thorough illustration of the source. The pros and cons of the paper have been well elaborated with the active voice usage.